sbyte: (Default)
[personal profile] sbyte
OMG, an appeals court in California overturned a rape conviction based on a law dating back to 1872. It doesn't protect single women in certain types of rape cases. Apparently, if the perpetrator masquerades as a woman's spouse, it is rape. However, if he masquerades as a boyfriend, it is legal!

“any person who fraudulently obtains the consent of another to sexual relations escapes criminal liability (at least as a sex offender under title IX of the Penal Code), unless he (or she) … masquerades as the victim’s spouse.”

ABC News says that the decision also urges the Legislature to examine the law, which was first written in response to cases in England that concluded fraudulent impersonation to have sex wasn't rape because the victim would consent, even if they were being tricked into thinking the perpetrator was their husband.

The article is all over the Internet, but here are a couple of links.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/judge-law-protect-unmarried-victims-rape-18127736

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256982/Julio-Morales-Rape-charges-dropped-man-snuck-bed-drunken-woman-sex-wasnt-MARRIED.html
From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

sbyte: (Default)
sbyte

June 2013

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324 2526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 22nd, 2017 05:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios